Tribalism in Baluchistan
By Helmand Khan
This is related to the present situation in the South Western Province-Baluchistan- of Pakistan. At the moment, there is a low- level insurgency going on and Baluch militants are involved in armed struggle with Pakistani security forces. Their struggle is portrayed as if they are fighting for securing the rights of the people usurped by the federal government. Baluchistan is my province of origin. I suspect that in practice these militants want to have resources from the federal government, only to be utilized by the sardars and nawabs of Baluchistan. Most of sardars (chieftains) and nawabs(chieftains) stand for tribalism.They thrive on tribalism. They have a direct incentive to keep the people and their tribesmen uneducated so that their sons and grandsons continue to be sardars and nawabs. They are not democratic in character. They have never allowed democracy even among their tribesmen. By very nature, tribalism is anti democratic, against women's emancipation and protects the privileges of the sardars and nawabs. I being a strong believer in liberal democracy, women's rights and modernism can never subscribe to perpetuating tribalism in Baluchistan.
However, my opposition to militants do not mean that I support the federal government. It has neglected minorities for long but support for tribalism is not going to further the cause of the people of Baluchistan either.
This is related to the present situation in the South Western Province-Baluchistan- of Pakistan. At the moment, there is a low- level insurgency going on and Baluch militants are involved in armed struggle with Pakistani security forces. Their struggle is portrayed as if they are fighting for securing the rights of the people usurped by the federal government. Baluchistan is my province of origin. I suspect that in practice these militants want to have resources from the federal government, only to be utilized by the sardars and nawabs of Baluchistan. Most of sardars (chieftains) and nawabs(chieftains) stand for tribalism.They thrive on tribalism. They have a direct incentive to keep the people and their tribesmen uneducated so that their sons and grandsons continue to be sardars and nawabs. They are not democratic in character. They have never allowed democracy even among their tribesmen. By very nature, tribalism is anti democratic, against women's emancipation and protects the privileges of the sardars and nawabs. I being a strong believer in liberal democracy, women's rights and modernism can never subscribe to perpetuating tribalism in Baluchistan.
However, my opposition to militants do not mean that I support the federal government. It has neglected minorities for long but support for tribalism is not going to further the cause of the people of Baluchistan either.
Comments